Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #83886 neevous tag madgie #83881

  Új Válasz 2017-09-28 16:00:15 #83886

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  neevous

  tag

  válasz madgie #83881 üzenetére

  Nagyjabol ugyanerre a gondolati sikra felfuzve:

  Vintage Mike: On the Sharpness of Lenses
  [link]

  Sharpness doesn't matter. Seen from a gestalt perspective, images can be very diffuse and broad-brush and still be recognizable, in the same way extreme abstraction can still be "read": that is, a line and two dots can be a "face," and vague fuzzy patterns of light and shade can be figurative. Ever seen those "pictures" made from thousands of little pictures? Fine detail in that case is little pictures that don't have anything to do with Marilyn Monroe, or whatever the "big picture" is "of." (Forgive all these quotation marks.) Fact is, fine detail resolution doesn't necessarily have much to do with why many photographs work as art—it often doesn't contribute to greater recognition of the subject, or to meaning. I could provide a list as long as your arm of great pictures in which even coarse detail can hardly be deciphered.

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák