Hirdetés
- Kormányok / autós szimulátorok topikja
- TCL LCD és LED TV-k
- AMD Navi Radeon™ RX 9xxx sorozat
- Fejhallgató erősítő és DAC topik
- Mégis meglepi egy új GeForce-szal a rajongókat az NVIDIA?
- Micro Four Thirds
- Vezetékes FEJhallgatók
- Milyen asztali (teljes vagy fél-) gépet vegyek?
- Házi barkács, gányolás, tákolás, megdöbbentő gépek!
- Gaming notebook topik
Aktív témák
-
csimika
csendes tag
For interest's sake, I did do some performance tests with defragging an SSD on my Intel X2-M.
There is some performance benefit, but it is small - and for general use would not be noticable, or probably even benchmarkable. However, there are some circumstances, where the performance increase may be detectable.
The issue comes from how the OS accesses data on the drive. If you have a block of data that is stored "sequentially", then the OS will request the data in the largest chunks supported by the drive (usually 512 kB per each SATA request). The result is that the drive will internally parallelize the individual flash lookups, and consolidate them into a single response.
Where a file is highly fragmented, the OS will request the data in the size of the fragmented chunks - these could, in extreme cases, be 4 or 8 kB chunks. Each request needs a SATA transaction, takes up a space in the request queue, and has overhead both in the drive controller and host SATA controller. This is why the "4kB random read" benchmark scores are so much lower than the "sequential read" scores on SSDs.
In effect, reading a highly fragmented file has an element of "random read" in it, which reduces performance compared to a sequential access.
Now, this is not really much to get excited over. But, I set up a contrived case, whereby I filled up the drive with 4K files, and then deleted some of them at random to free-up space, and then filled it up with a single large file, that would end up being massively fragmented.
Streaming that file was horribly slow (about 30 MB/s). Following a defrag, streaming that same file was over 200 MB/s.
In terms of the amount of writes that the defrag put on the drive, it was on the region of 40 GB. In terms of how much wear that put on the drive, I'd estimate the cost of that defrag at about $0.02. (i.e. it cost less than the electricity used by the PC during the time the defrag was running).
Szoval nemlehet bekapcsolni?
Aktív témák
- exHWSW - Értünk mindenhez IS
- Kormányok / autós szimulátorok topikja
- Anglia - élmények, tapasztalatok
- Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Fiat, Lancia topik
- Luck Dragon: Asszociációs játék. :)
- Okos Otthon / Smart Home
- Autós topik
- Itt a Galaxy S26 széria: az Ultra fejlődött, a másik kettő alig
- Metal topik
- Autós topik látogatók beszélgetős, offolós topikja
- További aktív témák...
- BESZÁMÍTÁS! MSI B450M R3 4100 8GB DDR4 240GB SSD GTX 1050Ti 4GB Asus Vento AD DeepCool 400W
- Yoga Pro 9 - RTX 5070 - 64GB - multitouch laptopok! - LENOVO GAMER BAZÁR - új lista (2026.03.03)
- ÁRGARANCIA!Épített KomPhone Ryzen 5 4500 16/32/64GB RAM RTX 3060 12GB GAMER PC termékbeszámítással
- Hp 855 G7 Ryzen 7 4750U 8 mag 16 szál 16Gb Ram Radeon Vega számlával boltból Garanciával
- REFURBISHED - DELL Universal Dock D6000 (452-BCYH) (DisplayLink)
Állásajánlatok
Cég: Laptopműhely Bt.
Város: Budapest

