- Fejhallgató erősítő és DAC topik
- Milyen asztali (teljes vagy fél-) gépet vegyek?
- Xiaomi Mi Box androidos médialejátszó 4K és HDR támogatással
- AMD K6-III, és minden ami RETRO - Oldschool tuning
- Androidos fejegységek
- Házi hangfal építés
- ThinkPad (NEM IdeaPad)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 / 5090 (GB203 / 202)
- Nem szabad futtatni az új Red Magic csúcstelefonokon a 3DMarkot
- Lenovo Thinkbook, Yoga széria
Aktív témák
-
csimika
csendes tag
For interest's sake, I did do some performance tests with defragging an SSD on my Intel X2-M.
There is some performance benefit, but it is small - and for general use would not be noticable, or probably even benchmarkable. However, there are some circumstances, where the performance increase may be detectable.
The issue comes from how the OS accesses data on the drive. If you have a block of data that is stored "sequentially", then the OS will request the data in the largest chunks supported by the drive (usually 512 kB per each SATA request). The result is that the drive will internally parallelize the individual flash lookups, and consolidate them into a single response.
Where a file is highly fragmented, the OS will request the data in the size of the fragmented chunks - these could, in extreme cases, be 4 or 8 kB chunks. Each request needs a SATA transaction, takes up a space in the request queue, and has overhead both in the drive controller and host SATA controller. This is why the "4kB random read" benchmark scores are so much lower than the "sequential read" scores on SSDs.
In effect, reading a highly fragmented file has an element of "random read" in it, which reduces performance compared to a sequential access.
Now, this is not really much to get excited over. But, I set up a contrived case, whereby I filled up the drive with 4K files, and then deleted some of them at random to free-up space, and then filled it up with a single large file, that would end up being massively fragmented.
Streaming that file was horribly slow (about 30 MB/s). Following a defrag, streaming that same file was over 200 MB/s.
In terms of the amount of writes that the defrag put on the drive, it was on the region of 40 GB. In terms of how much wear that put on the drive, I'd estimate the cost of that defrag at about $0.02. (i.e. it cost less than the electricity used by the PC during the time the defrag was running).
Szoval nemlehet bekapcsolni?
Aktív témák
- Forza sorozat (Horizon/Motorsport)
- sziku69: Szólánc.
- Luck Dragon: Asszociációs játék. :)
- sziku69: Fűzzük össze a szavakat :)
- Anglia - élmények, tapasztalatok
- Fejhallgató erősítő és DAC topik
- Mibe tegyem a megtakarításaimat?
- The Division 2 (PC, XO, PS4)
- Tőzsde és gazdaság
- PH!otósok beszélgetős, offolós topikja
- További aktív témák...
- GYÖNYÖRŰ iPhone 13 256GB Midnight -1 ÉV GARANCIA - Kártyafüggetlen, MS4447, 100% Akkumulátor
- 0perces Kolink KLA-003
- í kilenc! AKCIÓS PRECÍZIÓS KÉSZÜLÉK! 7670 i7-12850HX 32GB RAM 1TB SSD Nvidia RTX A3000 12GB 1 év gar
- AKCIÓ! Gigabyte Z790 i7 14700KF 64GB DDR5 1TB SSD RTX 5070Ti 16GB LIAN LI LANCOOL 207 850W
- Arris VIP7100 Android TV 4K
Állásajánlatok
Cég: Laptopműhely Bt.
Város: Budapest

