Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #357 Dare2Live félisten

  Új Válasz 2007-05-18 00:06:05 #357

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  Dare2Live

  félisten

  csakúgy 16-9röl:
  ''If you shoot landscapes and can live without geometry-correcting your images, there's no question that the Zeiss 21mm is a must-have bit of kit. If straight lines frequently crop up in your corners you may well wonder – what's the next best thing at this focal length: the 17-40L or the 17-35 AFS? The Olympus 21mm f2, or the new 16-35mm Mark II? And the answer is . . . the Contax N 17-35mm f2.8. Not because it's 'sharper' than the 21mm Distagon (though it does outperform the Canon 17-40L) but because it has such a well balanced blend of virtues in the 21-23mm range. Just don't shoot above 24mm with it!''
  
  Retrofocus ultrawides are extremely hard to design, but consider also this: while the Contax N 17-35/2.8 is not as sharp as the Distagon 21 at 21mm, it has less distortion, it is generally free of CA throughout its range and it has sharp corners (not wide open, but you get it at f/5.6 or so when other lenses need to go to f/16 if they ever get that level performance at all).''
  
  Anno elsőre-másodikra-harmadikra furcsa/vicces volt, hogy mért használnak rendszeresen k* jó fotósok 1.5milliós FFcanonon adapterrel Contax obit. Aztán rákerestem.....
  

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák