Hirdetés

Keresés

Hirdetés

Aktív témák

  • Kapti

    tag

    válasz wutuka #9413 üzenetére

    Nem lebeszélni akartalak, csak leírtam, hogy nálunk mi volt a tapasztalat. Nálunk sincs a cégnél semmi gond az SSD-kel mióta normális tápok (FSP) vannak a gépekben (kiharcoltam), és akkor még az energiaspórolásról nem is beszéltem. Javaslom vegyél egy olcsó, de gyors SSD-t rendszernek próbaképp és élvezd a sebességet, különben is neked normális tápod van.

    Phenom II X3 720BE @955X4 - Life is good.

  • Flashcash

    Közösségépítő

    válasz wutuka #9413 üzenetére

    Van benne valami, főleg az új SSD gyártóknál, új vezérlők megjelenésekor fordulnak elő nagyszámban hibák.

    Az amerikai newegg felhasználói tapasztalatok után jegyeztek fel kezdetleges adatokat, de fontos, hogy itt csak a felhasználók egy része ír vissza a tapasztalatairól, a valóságban ennél jobbak lehetnek a megbízhatósági arányok. Angolul van, nincs kedvem most lefordítani.

    Assuming newegg data means anything to you we have (sorted by most reviews and only picking drives worth buying performance wise)

    Intel 80GB retail 134 reviews 1 drive failed.
    Intel 80GB OEM 193 reviews 6 drives failed.
    combined we have 327 reviews and 7 drives failed or 1 failure for every 47 reviews (but we have no idea how many sold on newegg that didn't submit a review).

    OCZ Vertex 30GB Retail 353 reviews 4 drives failed and another 17 reviews with what I'm guessing are compatibility issues. Hard to say what percentage of those are the SSD controllers fault.

    OCZ Vertex 60GB retail is chock full of so many negative reviews I find it hard to categorize them all.

    OCZ Agility 60GB retail is a similar story (it's the same controller as the vertex but just as importantly it's the same ODM)

    Patriot Torqx 128GB retail 118 reviews about 50 dead drives (worse than the vertex and agility but easier to count)

    Intel 160GB OEM 61 reviews 4 drives failed

    OCZ Agility 120GB retail 54 reviews 4 drives failed

    Intel 160GB Retail 52 reviews 0 failed some reviews about a preproduction firmware batch accidentally escaping the lab.

    Crucial M225 64GB Retail 50 reviews 2 failed

    Partiot Torqx 64GB retail 35 reviews too many failures for me to care about counting. Call it one in 3 reviews with some reviews mentioning multiple failed drives

    OCZ Vertex LE 100GB retail 17 reviews 0 failed (not exactly a large sample size and the are all reviews less than a month old. These drives could start failing any day now but for now the record is clean).

    Crucial C300 128GB retail 11 reviews 0 failed (again too early to call)

    Crucial C300 256GB retail 10 reviews 1 failed (again too early to call)

    Corsair Nova series 7 reviews 0 failed (again too early to call)

    Lets compare a couple of common drives:

    wd3200aaks 1042 reviews I lost count after about 50 or 60 dead drives I wouldn't be too surprised by a 2% or 3% failure rate in the first year on these. I need to find something with less reviews I guess.

    wd6400aaks and wd6401aals both have over 1000 reviews

    WD5000AAKB 500GB 386 reviews about 40 dead.

    WD20EADS 2TB 316 reviews about 70 dead.

Aktív témák